

Flaws in the Big Bang Point to GENESIS, a New
Millennium Model of the Cosmos: Part 6
Ultimate Disproof of the Big Bang Comes from Its Bizarre Prediction that Photons Are
Permanently Inscribed with H's Value at Time of Origin
(arXiv:physics/0102097 28 Feb 2001) by Robert V. Gentry
Abstract
A noted cosmologist has utilized big bang's expanding
spacetime redshift expression, z_{exp} =
ℜ / ℜ_{e}
− 1,
and the astronomical redshift expression, z = λ /
λ_{e}
− 1, to obtain an
expression for the predicted present rate of photon wavelength change induced by expansion,
here denoted by (dλ / dt)_{exp}. When this expression is
simplified
in terms of the values of H, the present value of the Hubble
constant, and H_{e}, its value at the time of emission of photons from distant galaxies,
there results an expression showing the present rate of photon
wavelength change depends on both the present value of the Hubble constant,
as well as its value at the time of emission in distant galaxies,
namely, (dλ / dt)_{exp}
= Hλ − H_{e}λ_{e}. This bizarre
result requires two things: First, because of big bang's homogeneity assumption, all
photons in the universe must be simultaneously undergoing the changes
specified by this expression; this is nothing less than ongoing,
instantaneous actionatadistance all throughout the universe's
thirtybillionlightyear diameter. Second, the fact that it requires not only individual
photons be initially imprinted with H's value,
corresponding to their respective times of origin, but also that this imprint should
determine the rate of present wavelength expansion is proof that the
expansion hypothesis has always stood in contradiction to all of modern
physics.
Parts 2 through 5 of this series have already shown several
reasons why the FL expansion postulate involved results and requirements,
such as nonconservation of energy, that contradicted known physical laws. We now show
its existence would have involved still another anomaly, thus
far virtually overlooked.
In theory the expression, λ = (ℜ / ℜ_{e})λ_{e},
says that all photons emitted at time t_{e}, with wavelength,
λ_{e}, when the
expansion factor was ℜ_{e}, will now at time t, possess the same
λ for the same ℜ.
Thus, since the FriedmannLemaitre universe was presumed to be homogeneous and isotropic,
then the rate of wavelength change, dλ / dt, due to expansion at
any specific point in the cosmos would have been instantaneously identical with the
rate at any other point in the universe. And, since dλ / dt
was
itself presumed to be changing, homogeneity would have required universal,
instantaneous synchronization of this change in every photon throughout the universe's
thirtybillionlightyear diameter. Since the CBR photon number density is
about 410 cm^{−3}, then the total number of photons throughout the
cosmos in the CBR alone is more than 10^{85}. Added to that number would of
course be those in starlight and other forms of electromagnetic radiation.
Thus, in some way that was never defined by modern physics, expansion's
effects were required to instantly and synchronously induce specific
wavelength changes to more than 10^{85} photons, irrespective of their location
throughout the cosmos.
As we will now show, the foregoing conclusions are a direct
consequence of Weinberg's attempt to determine if it was possible to
detect a presentday change in a galaxy's redshift due to the effects of expansion
[1]. Thus we turn attention to Weinberg's derivation of expansion's
presumed effect on the present rate of change of a photon's redshift, which is
on page 451 of his book [1]. If we let ℜ = ℜ(t)
and ℜ_{e }= ℜ(t_{e})
represent respectively the cosmic scale factors at some arbitrary time, t, at
the present, and at some time of emission, t_{e}, from some distant galaxy, then
the hypothesized expression for the expansion redshift is written as z_{exp} = ℜ / ℜ_{e}
− 1
Differentiating this expression with respect to t, the
present time coordinate, Weinberg first obtains
dz_{exp }/ dt = [ℜ_{e
}(dℜ / dt) − ℜ (dℜ_{e} / dt_{e})
(dt_{e} /
dt)] / ℜ_{e}^{2},

(1) 
or
dz_{exp }/ dt =
[ℜ_{e}ℜ^{⋅} − ℜℜ^{⋅}_{e
}(dt_{e} /
dt)] / ℜ_{e}^{2},

(2) 
and then utilizes the substitution dt_{e} / dt =
ℜ_{e }/ ℜ from his equation 14.3.4
on page 416, to obtain
dz_{exp }/ dt = ℜ^{⋅} / ℜ_{e} −
ℜ^{⋅}_{e}
/ ℜ_{e},

(3) 
which is his equation 14.6.23, as it appears on page 451. By
definition the value of the Hubble constant at present is H =
ℜ^{⋅}/ ℜ, and its value at time
t_{e} is presumed to have been H_{e} =
ℜ^{⋅}_{e}
/ ℜ_{e}. If we first rewrite Eq. (3) as
dz_{exp }/ dt = (ℜ^{⋅} / ℜ) (ℜ / ℜ_{e}) − ℜ^{⋅}_{e}
/ ℜ_{e},

(4) 
and then utilize the foregoing values for the Hubble constant,
we obtain
dz_{exp }/ dt = H (ℜ / ℜ_{e}) − H_{e}.

(5) 
As noted in Part 2 of this series, for high z objects the
expansion redshift, z_{exp} = ℜ / ℜ_{e}
− 1, is assumed to be the
main component of the observed redshift, z_{obs} = λ
/ λ_{e }− 1. So in this
case bigbang cosmology leads to the hypothesized expression,
λ / λ_{e}
= ℜ / ℜ_{e}.

(6) 
Since λ_{e} is always assumed a constant, then from
z_{obs} = λ /
λ_{e }−
1 we find
dz_{obs} / dt = (dλ
/ dt) / λ_{e}.

(7) 
Substitution of Eqs. (6) and (7) into Eq. (5) yields
dλ / dt = Hλ
− H_{e}λ_{e}.

(8) 
Before discussing the implications of Eq. (8), we pause to again
define its parameters. The wavelength, λ, is presumed to be the
redshifted analogue of λ_{e}, which represents the fixed, standard wavelength
of any specific spectral line, as determined by an observer at the point of emission. All
astronomical redshift calculations assume that λ_{e} is identical with
the terrestrial laboratory standard for that spectral line. Thus, dλ_{e}
/ dt = dλ_{e} / dt_{e}
= 0, which is why these terms are missing from Eqs. (7) and (8).
Equation (8) is extraordinary. It demands that, if the universe
were governed by FriedmannLemaitre expansion, then every photon in the
universe would now be experiencing a rate of wavelength change that is
dependent on the present value of the Hubble constant, H, as well
as its value at the time of emission, H_{e}, no matter when the emission
occurred. Thus, any two presently adjacent photons having identical instantaneous values
of λ , one born an hour ago, and the other in a distant galaxy, would
exhibit different dλ /
dt values because of intrinsic differences due to being
imprinted at birth with different values of H_{e}. This means bigbang cosmology
always required a photon's present physical characteristics be determined by a
memory of the spacetime expansion conditions at the time of its origin, as
well as instantaneous and synchronous actionatadistance throughout the cosmos,
which also requires a universal time standard.
Part 2 of this series discussed how the effects of spacetime
expansion were perceived by various cosmologists. It was noted that the
contradictions were sufficient to show the theory must be flawed. Parts 3, 4, and 5
confirmed this, and the present discussion does even more. What is now
reported is the discovery that if expansion ever existed, it would have
required photons to forever retain an imprint of the Hubble constant at their
respective times of emission. This result is so bizarre that it is sufficient in
itself to falsify the expansion hypothesis, independent of any other considerations.
Actually, however, this result in not surprising at all considering that
it is critically hinged on the assumption of the validity of Eq. (6), which, as
Part 5 showed, is the fatally flawed connecting link between the real world of
astronomy and the imaginary world of spacetime expansion. In one sense we have
discovered a second falsification of the expansion hypothesis. It is
somewhat puzzling how this extraordinary feature remained undiscovered until now
[2].
References
[1] Steven Weinberg, Gravitation and Cosmology, (John
Wiley& Sons, 1972) pp. 416, 451.
[2] Many thanks to Dave Gentry for useful discussions.


